suppourt@courtaicac-hr.us
+1-888-282-2241
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • About The Court
    • Arbiters And Authority
    • Cases & Opinions
    • Legal status – locations
    • Complaints & Arguments
    • Directory Of Members
    • H. R. Defenders
    • Documents & Stare Decisis
    • Filing & Rules
    • News Media
  • OUR BLOG
  • Us Federal Register
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • About The Court
    • Arbiters And Authority
    • Cases & Opinions
    • Legal status – locations
    • Complaints & Arguments
    • Directory Of Members
    • H. R. Defenders
    • Documents & Stare Decisis
    • Filing & Rules
    • News Media
  • OUR BLOG
  • Us Federal Register
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • About The Court
    • Arbiters And Authority
    • Cases & Opinions
    • Legal status – locations
    • Complaints & Arguments
    • Directory Of Members
    • H. R. Defenders
    • Documents & Stare Decisis
    • Filing & Rules
    • News Media
  • OUR BLOG
  • Us Federal Register
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • About The Court
    • Arbiters And Authority
    • Cases & Opinions
    • Legal status – locations
    • Complaints & Arguments
    • Directory Of Members
    • H. R. Defenders
    • Documents & Stare Decisis
    • Filing & Rules
    • News Media
  • OUR BLOG
  • Us Federal Register
  • Contact Us
CASES AND OPINIONS

Three honorable Institutions from the United States ask His Honorable Excellency Prime Minister of Japan KISHIDA Fumio for help.

admin@ May 11, 2023 0 Comments

Unique opportunity for Japan and its prime minister Honorable KISHIDA Fumio to build something urgently that due to its human rights character is now superior to global warming:

Three honorable Institutions from the United States ask His Honorable Excellency Prime Minister of Japan KISHIDA Fumio and Chairman of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to consider that it is now in his power to advocate for the historic initiative to create a unit specially organized for the task of healing illegal migration worldwide which is causing all kinds of crimes, outrage, offense, injury, with flagrant violations of all universal human rights.

In 2010 I wrote a book entitled “The Immigrant Universe” I did make an important short review in which I point out that world immigration will never end, it will be violent and criminal, but I stress that the G7 countries can eradicate this type of illegal and ruthless immigration.

Since then, I with my three Institutions, have been and continue to advocate for this principle. My three Institutions are: the American International Court of Arbitration and the Human Rights Commission- Court AICACHR [INGO], the National Association for Foreign Attorneys [NAFA LAW] and the University of Homologations UNPAM. Every year we make international calls seeking support for this purpose. We now once again make a special appeal to the honorable excellence Prime Minister of Japan KISHIDA Fumio.

In 2023, Japan assumes the presidency of the G7. Throughout the year, more than 10 Ministerial Meetings will be held in Japan, from Sapporo in the north to Miyazaki in the south, attended by many government officials, the media and others from around the world. See this excellent video: https://www.g7hiroshima.go.jp/en/

Quoting the prime minister Fumio: “From May 19 to 21, the G7 Summit will take place in Hiroshima, my hometown. Hiroshima is a beautiful city surrounded by the lush Chugoku Mountains, facing the calm Seto Inland Sea. I really look forward to welcoming the G7 leaders to Hiroshima. At the same time, as the world’s attention turns to Japan this year, it will be a great opportunity to show the world our country’s charms, from beautiful scenery, traditional cultures and local foods to cutting-edge technology…”

Definition of the Group of Seven (G7): member countries and how it works:

The Group of Seven (G-7) is an intergovernmental organization made up of the world’s largest developed economies: France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The government leaders of these countries meet regularly to discuss international economic and monetary issues, with each member holding the presidency on a rotating basis.

The G-7 was, for a time, known as the Group of Eight (G-8), until 2014 when former member Russia was ousted after illegally annexing the Crimea region of Ukraine.1 The European Union (EU) it is sometimes considered to be a de facto eighth member of the G-7, as it has all the rights and responsibilities of full members except chairing or organizing meetings.

The members of the G-20 are: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the USA, as well as the European Union, represented by the presidency of the rotating council and the European Central Bank.

KEY FINDINGS:

The Group of Seven (G-7) is an intergovernmental organization that meets regularly to address international economic and monetary issues.

The G-7 countries are the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, and Japan.

The G-7 was previously known as the G-8 until Russia was suspended from the group in 2014 after it illegally annexed Crimea.

The G-7 is not an official formal entity and therefore has no legislative or authoritative power to enforce the recommended policies and plans it compiles.

How the Group of Seven (G-7) works

The main objective of the G-7 is to discuss and sometimes act in concert to help solve world problems, with a particular focus on economic issues. Since its creation in the early 1970s, the group has discussed financial crises, monetary systems, and major global crises such as oil shortages.

The G-7 has also launched initiatives to finance problems and alleviate crises where it sees an opportunity for joint action. Those efforts include several aimed at debt relief for developing countries.

In 1996, in collaboration with the World Bank, the G-7 launched an initiative for the 42 Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC), along with a Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI), a 2005 commitment to cancel the debt of the countries of the International Development Association that have gone through the MDRI program.

In 1999, the group also decided to become more directly involved in the “management of the international monetary system” by creating the Financial Stability Forum (FSB). The FSB is made up of the main national financial authorities, such as finance ministers, central bankers and international financial organizations.

History of the Group of Seven (G-7).

The group’s origins date back to the early 1970s, when the leaders of the US, UK, France, West Germany and Japan met informally in Paris to discuss the recession and oil crisis. That, in turn, inspired French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing to invite the leaders of those countries, plus Italy, to Rambouillet in 1975 to continue discussions on world oil, this time with the country’s leaders joining finance ministers, a list of attendees that has endured The following year, Canada was invited to join the group.

The host of the G7 summit, also known as the presidency, rotates annually among member countries in the following order: France, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy, and Canada.

Expansion to G-8.

The G-7 has responded as the global economy has evolved, including as the Soviet Union pledged to create an economy with freer markets and held its first direct presidential election in 1991. Following a G-7 meeting in 1994 In Naples, President Boris Yeltsin held meetings with the member countries of the G-7, in what became known as the P-8 (Political 8). In 1998, at the urging of leaders such as US President Bill Clinton, Russia was added to the G-7 as a full member, creating a formal Group of Eight, or G-8.

The G-8 ended up being short-lived. In 2014, Russia was suspended from the group following the annexation of Crimea and tensions in Ukraine. As of 2021, Russia has not been invited back to the G-7.1

The Group of Seven (G-7) vs. the Group of 20 (G-20).

As developing nations began to represent a larger part of the global economy, the absence of a forum on international financial affairs that included emerging economies became more conspicuous.

In response, the Group of 20 (G-20) was created in 1999, consisting of all the members of the G-7, plus 12 additional countries and the EU. As the economies and trade activity of markets such as China, Brazil, India, Mexico and South Africa, all members of the G-20, increase, many observers now see the G-20 as usurping much of the role and eminence it once had the G-20. G-7.

G7 Summit 2021 On June 11-13, 2021, the G7 met in Cornwall, England.

According to statements released by the group, much of the discussion at the 2021 summit centered on two separate topics: the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and the climate crisis. The G7 pledged to distribute one billion doses of vaccines in the next 12 months.

In response to the climate crisis, the group committed to the following actions: achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050, limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees, increase and improve climate finance, and conserve at least 30 % of our land and oceans by 2030.

As of 2023, G7 members account for more than half of global net wealth (more than $200 trillion), 30 to 43 percent of global gross domestic product, and 10 percent of the world’s population (770 million). of people). The members are major powers in world affairs and maintain mutually close political, economic, diplomatic and military relations.

The G7 is not treaty-based and does not have a permanent secretariat or office. It is organized through a presidency that rotates annually among the member states, with the presiding state setting the group’s priorities and hosting and organizing its summit; Japan currently presides for 2023.

Although it lacks a legal or institutional basis, the G7 is widely considered to wield significant international influence; He has catalyzed or spearheaded several major global initiatives, including efforts to combat the HIV/AIDS pandemic, provide financial aid to developing countries, and address climate change through the 2015 Paris Agreement.

However, the group has been criticized by observers for its allegedly outdated and limited membership, narrow global representation, and ineffectiveness. They are also opposed by anti-globalization groups, who often protest at summits.

What other remedy is possible? Could my petition have federal jurisdiction in the United States court?

Federal Courts and the Public: Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving: United States between states or between the United States government and foreign governments.

Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving the United States government, the Constitution or federal laws, or disputes between states or between the United States government and foreign governments.

Our Jurisdiction Is Here: The US Treasury Department engages with the Group of 7 (G7) and the Group of 20 (G20) on a variety of international economic development and security issues.

The G-7, which includes Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, has met regularly since the mid-1980s at the level of finance minister and central bank governor. The G-20 has also met regularly since 1999 at the level of finance minister and central bank governor. In 2008, the leaders of the G-20 countries began to meet regularly to address the global financial crisis and in 2009 the G-20 was elevated to the main international economic forum.

The members of the G-20 are: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the USA, as well as the European Union, represented by the presidency of the rotating council and the European Central Bank.

Respectfully issued and submitted by, Humphrey Humberto Pachecker, JD, LLM.

Colleagues I inform you. My cause of action: Unique opportunity for Japan and its prime minister to build something urgently superior to global warming. But otherwise the internal action on my part could be the following:

NAFA LAW and I in ‘my own person’ “pro se” will file a lawsuit to request a declaratory sentence. This is a binding judgment of a federal court that defines the legal relationship between the parties and their rights in a matter before the federal court. When there is uncertainty about the legal obligations or rights between the parties, the declaratory sentence offers an immediate means to resolve said uncertainty.

I am going to practice “pro se” as my last legal action, my last case. My right to appear pro se in a civil case in federal court is contained in federal statute 28 U.S.C. § 1654. Basically it dictates that any person can appear for himself, and it is considered that he appears before the Court in person in any case of federal litigation.

I have experience in this practice and federal litigation since 2004 when I filed a federal lawsuit against Fidel Castro and his entire Cuban communist party. This lawsuit with several judicial causes of damages and crimes was filed by me in the federal courts of Florida and in the end I received a default judgment in my favor in January 2005 for damages and losses, especially in favor of anonymous Cuban citizens including myself. father. After the sentence and under political pressure from Washington DC the federal judge issued an order dismissing the case, and trying to explain in seven [7] pages the reasons for his action. See full details and official documents by entering this link here: http://nafalaw.com/blog/2018/10/14/2505/

This means that I know what I intend to deal with. But this time it will be requesting a declaratory sentence to define the legal relationship between the parties and their rights in a matter of International and Federal Law to outline what are the obligations and legal rights between all parties in reference to illegal immigration, its consequences in the many human rights violations. This non-adversarial demand to receive a declaratory judgment which will offer an immediate means to resolve said uncertainty and responsibilities between the G7 and G20 countries with the aforementioned violations caused by this global illegal and criminal immigration.

And these same introductory allegations with my allegations based on information and beliefs, not necessarily as a statement of fact, which on May 11, 2023 I submitted electronically to the honorable Prime Minister of Japan Mr. KISHIDA Fumio, country that in this year 2023, Japan assumes the presidency of the G7.

Throughout this year 2023, more than 10 Ministerial Meetings will be held in Japan, from Sapporo in the north to Miyazaki in the south, attended by many government officials, media and others from all over the world. . From May 19 to 21, the G7 Summit will take place in Hiroshima.

At the same time, as the world’s attention turns to Japan this year, it will be a great opportunity to show the world these, my remarks in which I make the point that global illegal immigration will never end, it will be violent and criminal, as we can see now but I stress that the G7 and G20 countries can eradicate this type of illegal and ruthless immigration as I describe in my pleadings. See full details by entering this link here: http://courtaicac-hr.us/three-honorable-institutions-from-the-united-states-ask-his-honorable-excellency-prime-minister-of-japan-kishida -fumio-for-help/

To achieve this noble purpose, we need funds, thousands of dollars, as well as legal labor, thousands of hours of work. Colleagues, students and friends: If you can collaborate in one way or another and/or in both ways, then write me directly to the email: nafa@nafalaw.com

Thanks, and I’ll stay tuned. Humberto H. Pachecker.

62
498 Views
Prev¿Qué tienen contra Israel en la historia del hombre?April 7, 2023
Abogado Dr. Humberto H. Pachecker les envía esta pregunta a las organizaciones y activistas de DD.HH.June 6, 2023Next

Related Posts

CASES AND OPINIONS

Registro oficial 2022 COURT AICAC-HR

************ Registro oficial 2022 COURT AICAC-HR. Directrices, comentarios y...

admin@ January 6, 2022
CASES AND OPINIONS

INVITACION GENERAL: Toda/o profesional extranjero…

INVITACION GENERAL: Toda/o profesional extranjero quien tenga conocimientos en las...

admin@ April 20, 2024

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Blog Menu

About The Court
Legal Status – Locations
H. R. Defenders
Arbiters And Authority
Filing And Rules
Cases And Opinions
Complaints And Arguments
Documents And Stare Decisis
News Media
Directory Of Members

The American International Court of Arbitration and Commission for Human Rights (AICAC-HR) was founded in the District of Columbia WA DC as an international human rights judicial body and international arbitration based in United States.

Read More...
Services
About the court
Legal status – locations
H. R. defenders
Arbitera and authority
Finling and rules
Cases and opinions
Contacts
Adress: 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington DC, 20004
Adress: 3200 US Highway 27 South Suite 302, Sebring, FL 33870
Email: support@courtaicac-hr.us
Email: secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us
Phone: +1-888-282-2241
Phone: +1-863-314-6094
Newsletter

CLICK HERE FOR NEWSLETTER

Terms of use | Privacy Environmental Policy

Copyright © 2019 Orlando Computer systems. All Rights Reserved.