*************

Estimada/os colegas miembros de NAFA LAW y de Corte AICAC-HR. Defensora/es de los Derechos Humanos.

La Comisión de DD. HH.,  de la Corte AICAC-HR, y su Comisionado General, Dr. Humberto Humphrey Pachecker, invitan participar entre colegas- estudiantes y amiga/os  una campaña de querellas y denuncias individuales a radicar ante la Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos, Alto Comisionad Licdo. Volker Turk- NO COSTOS.

Para cumplir con este llamado formal, anexamos el formulario oficial de ONU – DD. HH., el cual deben llenar por cada caso, bien sea en forma colectiva de personas violentadas y/o lastimadas, y/o desparecidas. Estamos incluyendo dos formularios. 1- Oficial de ONU – DD.HH. [Inglés]. 2- Oficial COURT AICAC-HR [Español].

Todas las comunicaciones destinadas a la tramitación del procedimiento de denuncias del Consejo de Derechos Humanos deben dirigirse a:

Unidad de Procedimiento de denuncias [forma virtual]
División del Consejo de Derechos Humanos
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra
CH-1211 Ginebra 10, Suiza
Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

La Comisión General de los Derechos Humanos de la Corte AICAC-HR, y su Comisionado General, Dr. Humberto Humphrey Pachecker- unido al Departamento de Estado de EE.UU., señalan violaciones de DD.HH., en Cuba, Venezuela y Nicaragua igualmente otros paises de Latinoamerica:

************

VENEZUELA 2025. Un nuevo informe de la dependencia de la ONU que vela por las garantías fundamentales reporta detenciones arbitrarias, desapariciones forzadas, torturas y otros atropellos en la nación sudamericana de Venezuela. El titular de esa oficina, en tanto, insta a Estados Unidos a detener las deportaciones de venezolanos que puedan correr riesgos al regresar a su país.

Es Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos el Licdo. Volker Turk indicó ante el Consejo de Derechos Humanos que su Oficina documentó una serie de violaciones entre las que destacan detenciones arbitrarias, desapariciones forzadas, torturas y malos tratos, particularmente en el contexto de las recientes elecciones parlamentarias y presidenciales. El informe abarca el año iniciado el 1 de mayo de 2024.

Uno de los hechos más preocupantes ocurrió antes de los comicios del mes pasado, cuando las autoridades venezolanas bajo las órdenes de Nicolas Maduro detuvieron a cerca de 70 personas, incluyendo figuras de la oposición, nuestros defensores de derechos humanos y 17 ciudadanos extranjeros, bajo acusaciones de pertenecer a un grupo terrorista.

************

CUBA. La violación en Cuba del 99.9% de la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas (ONU) es un hecho real. Durante los últimos 62 años, el Gobierno comunista de Cuba ha desarrollado una maquinaria represiva feroz y brutal. En Cuba igual que en China comunista, la negación de derechos civiles y políticos básicos está contemplada en la legislación. En nombre de la legalidad, las fuerzas de seguridad, con ayuda de las organizaciones de masas represivas, y de acción rápida controladas por el Estado, silencian la disidencia a golpes, con duras penas de prisión, amenazas de enjuiciamiento, hostigamiento, exilio o desapariciones. El Gobierno cubano emplea estos instrumentos para limitar gravemente el ejercicio de los derechos humanos fundamentales a la libertad de expresión, asociación y reunión. Las condiciones en las prisiones cubanas son inhumanas y los presos políticos padecen el trato degradante y la tortura es fundamental para el Gobierno comunista. En este último año, el Gobierno cubano, bajo el verdugo Diaz-Canel con la supervicios de Raul Castro ha añadido nuevas tacticas represivas y continuado los procesamientos de disidentes no violentos mientras hace caso omiso a los llamamientos internacionales de verdadera reforma. Engañan y apaciguan al resto del mundo, a los dignatarios que visitan el país con la puesta en libertad ocasional de presos políticos.

************

VENEZUELA. En la crisis continuada de derechos humanos sufridas en Venezuela se recibieron de nuevo noticias sobre ejecuciones extrajudiciales, uso excesivo de la fuerza y homicidios ilegales cometidos por las fuerzas de seguridad bajo el mando del verdugo Nicolás Maduro- a lo largo del año. Quienes critican las políticas del gobierno —como periodistas, profesionales de la salud y activistas de la política— son objeto de medidas represivas incluyendo la criminalización, los juicios injustos y la detención arbitraria. Se recibieron informes de tortura y otros malos tratos y desaparición forzada de personas detenidas arbitrariamente. Los defensores y defensoras de los derechos humanos sufren estigmatización y encuentra dificultades para llevar a cabo su labor. La crisis humanitaria empeoró, con una escasez generalizada de servicios y unos elevados índices de pobreza extrema. La pandemia de COVID-19 agravó tanto esta situación como el deterioro progresivo de la infraestructura del servicio de salud. Las personas que regresan al país son recluidas en centros de cuarentena estatales en condiciones y durante periodos que podían constituir detención arbitraria y malos tratos. La Misión Internacional Independiente de Determinación de los hechos sobre la República Bolivariana de Venezuela, establecida por la ONU, determinó que existían motivos razonables para creer que en el país se cometían crímenes de lesa humanidad desde 2014 y que el presidente Maduro y altos cargos militares y ministeriales habían ordenado los crímenes documentados en el informe que presentó, o habían contribuido a su comisión

***********

NICARAGUA. La situación de Nicaragua, el Departamento de Estado indicó en su informe que el gobierno de Daniel Ortega no ha hecho esfuerzos por investigar asesinatos denunciados C. AICAC-HR o por otros organismos de derechos humanos. “El presidente Ortega fortaleció activamente la impunidad a los abusadores de los derechos humanos, quienes fueron leales a él”, detalla el documento. Este informe menciona, a su vez, que en Nicaragua hay condiciones carcelarias severas y “potencialmente mortales y que en el país centroamericano tiene prisioneros políticos, graves problemas con la independencia del poder judicial y restricciones a la libertad de expresión”. Tambien, “La parapolicía y las personas vinculadas al régimen de Ortega llevan a cabo una campañas de hostigamiento, intimidación y violencia hacia los enemigos percibidos del régimen, como expresos políticos, activistas, campesinos, grupos de oposición, e integrantes de la Iglesia Católica”.

************

¿Cómo funciona el procedimiento de denuncia?

De conformidad con el párrafo 94 de la resolución 5/1, el Presidente del Grupo de Trabajo sobre Comunicaciones, junto con la Secretaría, realizar una selección inicial de las comunicaciones basadas en los criterios de admisibilidad establecidos en los párrafos 85 a 88 de la resolución 5/1. Manifiestamente infundada y las comunicaciones anónimas son descartadas. Las comunicaciones no rechazadas en el cribado inicial son transmitidas al Estado en cuestión para obtener sus opiniones sobre las denuncias de violaciones. Tanto el autor de una comunicación y el Estado de que se trate estén informados de las actuaciones en cada etapa.

Dos grupos de Trabajo distintos: el Grupo de Trabajo sobre las Comunicaciones* y el Grupo de Trabajo sobre las Situaciones – son responsables, respectivamente, para examinar las comunicaciones escritas y llevando un cuadro persistente de violaciones manifiestas y fehacientemente probadas de los derechos humanos y las libertades fundamentales a la atención del Consejo. (Haga clic en la sección “En esta sección” para obtener más información sobre ambos grupos de trabajo y las reuniones a puerta cerrada del Consejo).

¿Cuáles son los criterios para que una comunicación sea aceptada para su examen?

Una comunicación relacionada con una violación de los derechos humanos y las libertades fundamentales será admisible a los efectos de este procedimiento, siempre que:

No tenga motivaciones manifiestamente políticas y su objeto sea compatible con la Carta de las Naciones Unidas, la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos y otros instrumentos aplicables en el campo de los derechos humanos.

Contenga una descripción fáctica de las presuntas violaciones, incluidos los derechos que supuestamente se hayan vulnerado.

El lenguaje empleado no sea insultante. Sin embargo, la comunicación podrá ser examinada si cumple los demás criterios de admisibilidad una vez suprimidas las expresiones insultantes.

La presente una persona o un grupo de personas que afirmen ser víctimas de violaciones de derechos humanos y libertades fundamentales, o una persona o grupo de personas, incluidas ONG, que actúen de buena fe de conformidad con los principios de derechos humanos, no tengan posturas políticamente motivadas contrarias a lo dispuesto en la Carta de las Naciones Unidas y que sostengan tener conocimiento directo y fidedigno de esas violaciones. Sin embargo, las comunicaciones que estén debidamente fundamentadas no serán inadmisibles sólo porque la información de los autores individuales sea de segunda mano, a condición de que se acompañen de pruebas claras.

No se base exclusivamente en informes difundidos por los medios de comunicación.

No se refiera a un caso que parezca revelar un cuadro persistente de violaciones manifiestas y fehacientemente probadas de los derechos humanos del que ya se esté ocupando un procedimiento especial, un órgano creado en virtud de un tratado u otro procedimiento de denuncia análogo, de las Naciones Unidas o regional, en la esfera de los derechos humanos.

Se hayan agotado los recursos de la jurisdicción interna, salvo que parezca que esos recursos serían ineficaces o podrían prolongarse injustificadamente.

Las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos que se han establecido y trabajan conforme a los Principios relativos al estatuto de las instituciones nacionales (Principios de París), en particular en lo referente a la competencia cuasi judicial, pueden constituir un medio eficaz para hacer frente a violaciones individuales de los derechos humanos.

¿Cómo presentar comunicaciones?

Por favor complete el formulario de procedimiento de denuncias Si usted considera que su comunicación cumple los criterios mencionados anteriormente.

¿A dónde enviaremos las comunicaciones y denuncias?

Las comunicaciones destinadas a la tramitación del procedimiento de denuncias del Consejo de Derechos Humanos podrán dirigirse a:

Unidad de Procedimiento de denuncias
Divisón del Consejo de Derechos Humanos
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas en Ginebra
CH-1211 Ginebra 10, Suiza
Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

BAJAR FORMULARIOS PARA PRESENTAR DENUNCIAS – HAZ CLIC PARA BAJARLO – LLENARLO Y ENVIARLO VIA CORREO EMAIL= DD.HH. -HRCComplaint Procedure Form

…………

CORTE AICAC-HR. DD. HH.= FORMULARIO COMPLAINT QUERELLA HHRR

…………

ENVIANOS TU CORREO A Email: secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us

…………

¿AUN NO ESTÁS AFILIADO? ENTONCES CONVIERTETE EN MIEMBRO ILUSTRE DE ESTA CORTE AICAC-HR Y SU COMISION GENERAL DE LOS DD. HH. HAZ CLIC EN ESTE ENLACE: http://courtaicac-hr.us/noticas-hh-rr-federal-registry-civil-rights-commission/

Indicadores de derechos humanos- Guía para la medición Nunca debemos olvidar que detrás de cada dato estadístico y la aplicación-. Te invitamos a compartirlo con otros colegas y sitios- http://courtaicac-hr.us/ Las denominaciones en esta publicación y la forma en que aparecen presentados los datos que contiene no entrañan, por parte de la Secretaría de las Naciones Unidas, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de ninguno de los países, territorios, ciudades o regiones o de sus autoridades, ni respecto de la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites. Las signaturas de los documentos de las Naciones Unidas se componen de letras mayúsculas combinadas con cifras. La mención de una de tales signaturas significa que se hace referencia a una publicación de las Naciones Unidas. Haz clic aquí para bajar este reporte completo:  https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Human_rights_indicators_sp.pdf

The Chinese COVID-19 pandemic was a prediction of what is coming to all of us now is undisputable proof with the Xi Jinping plan. I know and have studied since 1991 and I have published tens of articles about what is the behavior of the communist regimes of the world and their ranges of crimes starting with the communist regime of Cuba with dictator Fidel Castro, until now the most recent- the Communist China Plan culminating with the biological weapon COVID 19. The warning has already gone out to the world, and today I want to share with all of you this prediction again – with a publication published by The Western Journal – written by Michael Austin.

The Communist Party of China has all the trimmings of a modern-day totalitarian regime.

In addition, given the country’s growing economic and militaristic power, it can quite accurately be said that China is the greatest threat to liberty in the 21st century.

That was further exemplified on Thursday when Chinese President Xi Jinping lobbed threats of “broken heads and bloodshed” at the Communist administration’s foreign adversaries.

“​The Chinese people will absolutely not allow any foreign force to bully, oppress or enslave us and anyone who attempts to do so will face broken heads and bloodshed in front of the iron Great Wall of the 1.4 billion Chinese people,” ​Xi said Thursday, according to The Associated Press. References to bashing heads and bloodshed were not included in the Chinese media’s English translations of the speech.

In what seemed like a cruel twist of irony (but was likely an act of cold calculation), Xi levied his threats during a celebration of the 100th anniversary of the CCP near Tiananmen Square, the very same spot where thousands of innocent student protesters were slaughtered by the CCP’s death squads.

With his threats, Xi was likely referring to the many countries that have levied sanctions against China over the past few years, including the United States.

Unfair trade practices, theft of intellectual property, covering up the coronavirus outbreak and conclusive evidence of a government-led genocide have led to many such sanctions.

To back up his threats, Xi warned of his regime’s growing military strength. Is the CCP a major threat to freedom?

Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“We will turn the people’s military into a world-class military, with even stronger capabilities and even more reliable means to safeguard the nation’s sovereignty, security and development interests,” he said.

The threats then became more specific as Xi pledged his government would finish taking over the sovereign state of Taiwan.

“Solving the Taiwan question and realizing the complete reunification of the motherland are the unswerving historical tasks of the Chinese Communist Party and the common aspiration of all Chinese people,” ​he said, according to the New York Post.

“All sons and daughters of China, including compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, must work together and move forward in solidarity, resolutely smashing any ‘Taiwan independence’ plots.”

Unfortunately for the many victims of Chinese oppression, Democrats in the United States have failed to fight back against the CCP’s gross injustices.

Whereas Republicans and former President Donald Trump were firm in their opposition, Biden and the Democrat-controlled Congress have been anything but.

There’s only so much our country can do without risking all-out war. That being said, our leaders shouldn’t stand idly by while an oppressive dictatorship threatens our country with “bloodshed.”

All we can do is pray President Joe Biden grows a BACKBONE. And SOON!!!

************

The American International Court of Arbitration and Commission for Human Rights Centre for Expertise [AICAC-HR-CE]. Is a service Centre to perform the one following function in connection with the spread of China – COVID-19 in United States.

Hundreds of thousands of deaths in the United States, millions sick, millions of deceased and sick throughout the world. Negative social and economic outcomes, including world market crash, high rates of unemployment, falling household income, rising prices, disrupted student learning, suicides, hunger and extreme misery.

This investigation headed by lawyer professor Juris Doctor- Humphrey Humberto Pachecker raises a single question:

Did China Deliberately Spread The Coronavirus?

Pachecker is based on his hypothesis made from data that serves as the basis for initiating an investigation that this killer virus was created and came from a lab, very safe to say from the lab in Wuhan, and the lab is controlled by the China government.

This AICAC-HR-CE is calling to gather expert witnesses, particularly in common law share opinion on this matter by virtue of education, training, certification, skills or experience.

The AICAC-HR-CE may consider the witness’s specialized as scientific, technical or others, with opinion about evidence or about facts to be presented before the court within the expert’s area of expertise, and it will be referred to as an “expert opinion”.

In general, expert witnesses are called upon in the court system to serve as an objective party to the lawsuit and never function as an advocate for one side or the other. Expert witnesses, also are present in litigation to explain complicated scientific issues.

The main responsibilities of these expert witnesses are to evaluate potential problems on this matter, defects, omission, errors, deficiencies. And they could be called to testify under the assumption that all the preparation required for a competent evaluation of the process has been made.

These experts have a great responsibility, and especially in this matter. The use of expert witnesses maybe criticized in the USA because historically they maybe used by both sides to advocate differing positions, however this is not the case from AICAC-HR-CE Expert Witnesses. These AICAC-HR-CE Experts are legally prohibited from expressing their opinion of submitted evidence until after they are hired. AICAC-HR-CE Witnesses’ testimony will be favorable to the victims regardless of any basis submitted by other parties.

The following is a list of articles and personal opinions expressed, written and published by HUMPHREY H. PACHECKER, JD, since the beginning of this pandemic in March of 2020. These are not in the correct order of dates.  You can enter through each link – see and read details:

(1)- http://courtaicac-hr.us/to-the-government-of-china-this-will-be-a-human-rights-violations-action/

(2)- http://courtaicac-hr.us/how-china-has-waived-its-sovereign-immunity/

(3)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/china-beijing-presents-itself-savior-times-need-crown-pachecker/

(4)- http://nafalaw.com/blog/2012/06/28/nafa-busca-grupo-para-presentar-demanda-judicial/

(4-a)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-hypothesis-communist-chinese-biological-warfare-pachecker/

(5)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/action-take-government-china-federal-court-demand-civil-pachecker/

(6)- http://courtaicac-hr.us/china-con-su-partido-comunista-es-un-regimen-notorio-por-sus-continuas-violaciones-de-los-derecho-humano-lo-mismo-en-lo-civil-y-en-lo-penal/

(7)- http://courtaicac-hr.us/two-2-petitions-complaints-human-rights-vs-china-re-covid-19-english-espanol/

(8)- http://courtaicac-hr.us/investigacion-en-referencia-a-la-china-comunista-y-la-propagacion-del-virus-covid-19/

(9)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/political-opportunity-coincidence-humphrey-humberto-pachecker/

(10)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/would-biden-so-ready-kowtow-china-middle-beijing-hitler-pachecker/

(11)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/criminal-justice-covid-19-its-human-rights-pachecker/

(12)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/we-could-call-chinese-revenge-punishment-states-loyal-pachecker/

(13)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/china-has-become-americas-usa-number-one-enemy-have-us-pachecker/

(14)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/economic-warfare-involving-china-strategy-based-use-one-pachecker/

(15)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/conozco-la-infamia-comunista-desde-1959-s%C3%A9-c%C3%B3mo-estos-pachecker/

(16)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/today-we-finally-read-china-lab-under-chinese-pachecker/

(17)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-china-wants-dominate-world-humphrey-humberto-pachecker/

(18) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/florida-ha-radicado-la-primera-demanda-colectiva-contra-pachecker/

(19)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/florida-law-firm-has-filed-first-class-action-lawsuit-pachecker/

(20)- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/xi-jinping-ming-dynasty-seems-his-model-albeit-more-way-pachecker/?trackingId=CoDJq67URtn9ewlmMTk6AA%3D%3D

(21)- https://www.linkedin.com/in/humphrey-humberto-pachecker-3802a532/

La Comisión General de Derechos Humanos de la Corte AICAC-HR Washington DC- por medio de su Comisionado General, Dr. Humphrey Humberto Pachecker- Denuncia los crímenes que el dictador Daniel Ortega presidente de Nicaragua está cometiendo contra la prensa, la población, y candidatos políticos de la oposición.

Estados Unidos pide al gobierno de Nicaragua que libere de inmediato a la líder opositora Cristiana Chamorro y a sus dos colegas de la recientemente clausurada Fundación Violeta Barrios de Chamorro para la Reconciliación y la Democracia. Su detención por cargos falsos es un abuso de sus derechos humanos y representa un asalto a los valores democráticos, así como un claro intento de frustrar elecciones libres y justas. En un operativo criminal y abuso de poder detienen e inhabilitan a Chamorro en Nicaragua y Justicia determina que no podrá participar en las presidenciales.

“No estamos sorprendidos por esta accion criminal de Ortega” declaró el Comisionado Pachecker… “es el comportamiento de los peores criminales en América: Nicolás Maduro, Daniel Ortega y Miguel Díaz-Canel y Castro”.

Política hacia Cuba, Venezuela y Nicaragua ¿Qué está pasando en el PSOE?

Sale a la luz un documento que explicita el grado de comunicación imprudente y grave entre el PSOE en el Parlamento Europeo y el gobierno dictatorial de Cuba

Ha salido a la luz un documento que demuestra que un grupo amplio de europarlamentarios del PSOE ha traicionado principios muy básicos de la política, las instituciones europeas, la prudencia, la confidencialidad, la seguridad nacional y europea y el respeto a los derechos humanos, por jugar al internacionalismo corporativista pseudoideológico y anacrónico con los peores criminales con que uno pueda relacionarse: Nicolás Maduro, Daniel Ortega y Miguel Díaz-Canel y Castro.

El documento, un email, ha desvelado una relación íntima y estrecha de involucración del PSOE, desvelando estrategias, acciones aún no públicas y actos parlamentarios sin ningún límite ético a la dictadura de Cuba.

¿Qué pasaría si, sabiendo Cuba información confidencial de los movimientos del Parlamento Europeo, para evitarlo, alguno de los miembros del Parlamento Europeo más activos en la iniciativa fuera «neutralizado» por un «accidente»? ¿Sería el PSOE responsable de ello?

La mejor respuesta a esa pregunta es desear que jamás hubiera sido necesaria la duda.

El email recibido informaba de lo siguiente. «PPE y RENEW han pedido un punto en el próximo pleno sobre la situación en Cuba, declaración de Borrell con resolución. Uno de los puntos que quieren denunciar es el descrito en este manifiesto que han firmado ya 5 diputados. Como sabéis, va a ser difícil poder pararlo, no tenemos mayoría. Me pregunto si queréis avisar vosotros a la Embajada de Cuba o aviso yo a Heidy. El gabinete de Borrell ya está al tanto. Aprovecho el mail para pedir cita con Javier la semana aproxima para tratar este tema y otros si es posible».

El mensaje también demuestra que el PSOE, sin conocer ni analizar el contenido de la resolución, pues no versa sobre lo descrito por Pilar Huélamo, ya fija el objetivo de «pararla». ¿Es el PSOE en el Parlamento Europeo el brazo político de Raúl Castro o se está haciendo esto a espaldas de su Dirección Internacional?

¿Supo el Grupo S&D el viernes 28 de dicho contacto del PSOE inmediato con la Embajada de Cuba para filtrar la información?

La respuesta de Isabel Garcia Tamara, del despacho de Javier Moreno Sánchez, refrenda que el contubernio con Cuba es de tal magnitud que al instante responde que sí, que ejecutarán la comunicación con Cuba y la cita con ‘JM’, presidente del PSOE en el Parlamento Europeo y presidente del Grupo de Amistad con Cuba y quien alaba la labor del dictador Raúl Castro, del que penden todo tipo de crímenes de lesa humanidad.

Es tal el nivel de involucración arquetípica y ancestral de ciertos pseudosocialistas, que no socialdemócratas, con las mencionadas dictaduras con las que aún son incapaces de cortar el cordón umbilical que se creó como subproducto indeseable de la guerra fría y la dicotomía política nefasta que imperó antaño, que provoca tristeza.

Logros sagrados del ser humano son los derechos fundamentales del trabajador y trabajadora -que sufren esclavitud en las brigadas médicas cubanas- y de sus hijos –a los que prohíben ver a sus padres 8 años si estos no quieren continuar el trabajo-, de la mujer maltratada -en un país galopantemente machista y sin ley que proteja a las mujeres-, de los que piensan o cantan distinto -como ‘Patria y Vida’- y forman parte de los más de 150 presos y condenados políticos en Cuba, y de todos los que desean expresar su pensamiento sin ser hostigados, multados, detenidos o presos, y de los que desean un Estado de Derecho.

El PSOE y S&D tienen una resolución pendiente a favor de los derechos humanos en Cuba en el pleno de junio del Parlamento Europeo. ¿Se posicionará el PSOE con los criminales y maltratadores o con las víctimas? La vuelta a la centralidad del PSOE es un imperativo para la política española.  Fuente de: ABC Internacional. * Javier Larrondo es presidente de la ONG Prisoners Defenders.

La periodista Cristiana Chamorro Barrios, hija de la expresidenta Violeta Barrios de Chamorro (1990-1997), llega hoy a una rueda de prensa en la sede del partido Ciudadanos por la Libertad (CXL), en Managua (Nicaragua). Chamorro Barrios, investigada por el Ministerio Público por un caso de supuesto lavado de dinero cuando dirigió la Fundación Violeta Barrios de Chamorro, que cerró en febrero pasado, entregó una carta al Comité Nacional de Enlace de esa alianza en la que expresa sus intenciones de inscribirse como precandidata. EFE/ Jorge Torres

************

Political opportunity or coincidence? I, together with the National Association of Lawyers NAFALAW.COM, question whether it is just a coincidence that the coronavirus COVID 19, the main destroyer of millions of lives, families and economies in the world has arrived or was launched in the United States in the month of November 2019 on the eve of the political campaign for the re-election of President Donald J. Trump.

While the politicians of the Democrat Party, their followers and many unsuspecting ones wonder if it is just a coincidence that COVID 19 came to destroy us in the first month of campaign for the re-election of President Trump; In my opinion it is a very overwhelming coincidence to rule out a Chinese political maneuver that Xi Jinping and his Chinese Communist Party saw the precise opportunity to launch this epidemic at us and globally to successfully achieve their mission, remove President Trump, China world’s greatest enemy, to bring in a president sympathetic to China and, in this way, get the new President Biden to eliminate all the pressures, investigations, sanctions and trade tariffs that President Trump imposed on China. When China talks of “win-win cooperation”, it means that Beijing wins twice as much.

Ties between the United States and China had deteriorated in the past three years to a level not seen in decades due to ambition, property theft and Chinese government fraud against the United States; But now we see that the Biden era begins, and the China COVID 19 pandemic achieved its mission for China by improving the situation for Xi Jinping and his Chinese Communist Party, we have already seen that both governments send messages of respect and admiration.

The Communist Party and its president Xi Jinping warned at the ‘Davos Forum’ against a “new cold war” and called for “abandoning ideological prejudices and following a path of peaceful coexistence, mutual benefit and cooperation so that everyone wins” but behind this Xi Jinping already had his secret weapon, the Chinese COVID 19 pandemic.

While the Democrats, through their new White House spokesperson, Jen Psaki, pointed out that “they will start from an approach of patience” to respond to the “abuses” of the Asian country. “That means we are going to consult with our allies, with Democrats and Republicans, and we are going to allow the interagency process to develop to review and evaluate how we should move forward with our relationship,” Psaki said.

However, now it is clear that the Democrat Party saw a great political opportunity with the Chinese pandemic, and seized it to the last drop – helping its own party and its candidate Biden, and China as well, to take out of the way the greatest enemy of Communist China- President Trump, this was NOT a coincidence, this was political opportunism and a global crime.

Xi Jinping with the Chinese Communist Party and its officials now see the timing and trends on their side to defeat America, and they say it even more openly with habitual statements of ideas like, and I quote: “The East is rising and the West is in decline.” “It is almost as if they believe that the historical outcome is already determined.” All thanks to the secret weapon, the Chinese pandemic, which was not a coincidence.

************

The USA has to lift China’s immunity to enable COVID-19 victims to file class action lawsuits over the pandemic. It is a citizen’s right which would allow the victims of this pandemic to directly sue the Chinese Communist Party.

Last year 2020 we had a proposal from Senator Josh Hawley, who presented a bill that would allow the victims of the pandemic to directly sue the Chinese Communist Party- that holds the Government of this country to be tried in the USA courts based on the fact that China withheld information regarding the virus causing millions of cases and more than half a million deaths so far in US- June 2021.

This legislative proposal, was called at the time “Law of Justice for victims of Covid-19” proposed to remove the Chinese government of its sovereign immunity.

In addition, the proposal would create a State Department task force to investigate the management of the outbreak in China and help secure money from the Chinese government for the victims. “The Chinese Communist Party unleashed this pandemic,” Senator Hawley said. “They must be accountable to their victims.”

In this case, it is a moral duty of President Biden to ask Congress to be in charge of withdrawing said immunity, especially following a precedent that already exists in our country- a very recent precedent.

In 2016, Congress passed the “Law of Justice Against Promoters of Terrorist Acts,” which allowed victims and survivors to sue Saudi Arabia for complicity in the September 11 attacks. By then 2,996 people died. This time, the number is multiplied by hundreds of thousands. Today on June 3, 2021 in the USA we already have about 600 thousand deceased victims, with 3.3 million cases and hundreds of thousands of families destroyed, thousands of businesses and merchants destroyed and total chaos in our economy.

These class action lawsuits would allow the USA to seize Chinese business assets. Should Congress lift China’s immunity, the Asian giant could not ignore such demands.

According to the statements of the former official of the US Department of Justice, David Rivkin, collected by The Washington Post newspaper, a conviction could lead to commercial measures by the administration.

As long as and if Biden wants to do true justice for the people of the United States.

“Once the default judgments are obtained, they can be used to seize any Chinese business asset, including any product of Chinese exports anywhere in the world.” David Rivkin said.

The benefit would not only be financial compensation for the victims, but the case in court would help to search for the truth hidden by China- clarify the facts and this would be a great vehicle to search for the truth of that may be behind beyond the communist China COVID 19.

COVID 19- Communist China’s Biological warfare. Since February 2020 I have written about the use of biological toxins and infectious agents such as bacteria, viruses, insects, and fungi with the intent to kill, harm or incapacitate us humans as an act of war from Communist China. Biological weapons are living organisms and replicating entities.

I, Humphrey Humberto Pachecker, [www.nafalaw.com] a victim of communism evil and its genocides, have expressed this and wrote about it to the world that COVID 19 is a biological weapon of the Chinese Communist Party and its criminal dictator Xi Jinping to end the competition, to defeating the United States economy and of the world economy in order to position himself with China Communist Party as the world’s leading greatest economy and military power.

Unbelievers, unwary, and indeed communist socialists in America and around the world seek to ignore this terrible reality and eminent mortal danger.

In an exchange of words and concepts between myself and a well-known American Democrat socialist whom I will call here John Doe, in our verbal exchange Mr. Doe expressed to me, and I quote: that “[my] theory is “stupid” simply because COVID19 affects both- to the Chinese citizens within China and to the citizens in the rest of the world as well… “

My answer was simple in principle in a single sentence and I quote: “I know the Beast and have lived in his lair.”

Communism, like the Hitler, Stalin, are notorious mass genocidal, when they want to achieve full power and control do take any action even against it own people. And communist China has a gruesome history of massacring its own people to achieve what is today, “the world empire of communist terror.”

China is widely reported to have active programs related to the development of chemical and biological weapons, although essentially no details of these programs have appeared in the open literature.

China is believed to have an advanced chemical warfare program that includes research and development, production and weaponization capabilities. Its current inventory is believed to include the full range of traditional chemical agents. It also has a wide variety of delivery systems for chemical agents to include artillery rockets, aerial bombs, sprayers, and short-range ballistic missiles. Chinese forces have conducted defensive CW training and are prepared to operate in a contaminated environment. As China’s program is further integrated into overall military operations, its doctrine, which is believed to be based in part on Soviet-era thinking, may reflect the incorporation of more advanced munitions for CW agent delivery. China has signed and ratified the CWC.

On 30 December 1996 the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress China ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention [CWC]. Previous, dual-use chemical-related transfers to Iran’s chemical weapons program indicate that, at a minimum, China’s chemical export controls are not operating effectively enough to ensure compliance with China’s CWC obligation not to assist anyone in any way to acquire chemical weapons. In March 1997 Israeli authorities arrested an Israeli businessman, Nahum Manbar, for allegedly selling Chinese chemical weapon components to Iran.

On May 21, 1997, pursuant to the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991, the US Government imposed trade sanctions on five Chinese individuals, two Chinese companies, and one Hong Kong company for knowingly and materially contributing to Iran’s chemical weapons program. These individuals and companies were involved in the export of dual-use chemical precursors and/or chemical production equipment and technology. The Chinese companies were the Nanjing Chemical Industries Group (NCI) and the Jiangsu Yongli Chemical Engineering and Technology Import/Export Corp.

China possesses an advanced biotechnology infrastructure as well as the requisite munitions production capabilities necessary to develop, produce and weaponize biological agents. Although China has consistently claimed that it has never researched or produced biological weapons, it is nonetheless believed likely that it retains a biological warfare capability begun before acceding to the BWC. China is commonly considered to have an active biological warfare program, including dedicated research and development activities funded and supported by the Government for this purpose. There is essentially no open source data on the subject of Chinese BW activities, and many legitimate research programs use similar, if not identical equipment and facilities.

Here I’m going to name the greatest mass murderer of the 20th century. No, it wasn’t Hitler or Stalin. It was Mao Zedong for his China Communist Party.

According to the authoritative “Black Book of Communism,” an estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of Mao Zedong’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist communist world power” China.

Anyone who got in his way was done away with by execution, imprisonment or forced famine.

For Mao Zedong, the Number one enemy was the intellectual. The so-called Great Helmsman reveled in his blood-letting, boasting, “What’s so unusual about Emperor Shih Huang of the China Dynasty? He had buried alive 460 scholars only, but we have buried alive 46,000 scholars.” Mao was referring to a major “accomplishment” of the Great Cultural Revolution, which from 1966-1976 transformed China into a great House of Fear.

The most inhumane example of Mao Zedong’s contempt for human life came when he ordered the collectivization of China’s agriculture under the ironic slogan, the “Great Leap Forward.”

A deadly combination of lies about grain production, disastrous farming methods (profitable tea plantations, for example, were turned into rice fields), and misdistribution of food produced the worse famine in human history. Deaths from hunger reached more than 50 percent in some Chinese villages. The total number of dead from 1959 to 1961 was between 30 million and 40 million — the population of California.

China presents itself as a vast market for United States companies, investors, and cheap products for Americans. But now we and U.S. companies must take a very careful deep look at doing business in a country which considers Mao Zedong its ‘Patron Saint’.

Even Google has said it is reconsidering its operations in China after discovering a sophisticated cyber attack on its e-mail which the government must have initiated and approved. It has revealed what many in the Internet world have known for some time that China routinely hacks into U.S. and Western Web sites for national security and other valuable information.

Mao would have enthusiastically applauded this intellectual criminal rape.

We shall wonder if our President Biden be so ready to kowtow to China if in the middle of Beijing there was a mausoleum of Hitler and, hanging from the gate to the Forbidden City, a giant swastika or, to kowtowing as part of our US custom- to defend our Constitutional rights Compensation, Wrongful Death, Damages?

March 16, 2020: http://courtaicac-hr.us/to-the-government-of-china-this-will-be-a-human-rights-violations-action/

March 18, 2020: http://courtaicac-hr.us/how-china-has-waived-its-sovereign-immunity/

April 12, 2020: http://courtaicac-hr.us/china-con-su-partido-comunista-es-un-regimen-notorio-por-sus-continuas-violaciones-de-los-derecho-humano-lo-mismo-en-lo-civil-y-en-lo-penal/

August 7, 2020: http://courtaicac-hr.us/investigacion-en-referencia-a-la-china-comunista-y-la-propagacion-del-virus-covid-19/

March 20, 2021: http://courtaicac-hr.us/two-2-petitions-complaints-human-rights-vs-china-re-covid-19-english-espanol/

April 18, 2021: http://nafalaw.com/blog/2012/06/28/nafa-busca-grupo-para-presentar-demanda-judicial/

The Supreme Court consisted of nine justices in 1894. What would happen if Democrat politicians change the current structure of the Supreme Court of the United States?

Converting the United States Supreme Court from nine justices to thirteen justices, annexing by converting two new Democratic states, WA-DC, P.R., all of this completes the socialist resurgence in America. In every political action of the new Democratic party in recent times, the term socialism communism, is pushing- by force- an unprecedented popularity in the United States, especially among young people with the help of socialist politicians, socialist media and socialist corporations, all the way to the communist abyss. Beyond the multiple meanings of this signifier, often associated with a Socialist-type Welfare State, the truth is that the American left shows a renewed vitality and new figures have been transforming the political landscape to socialism-communism with the forces of Congress and the media. With one foot in and one foot out of the Democratic Party, a variety of currents are building a clearly renewed left to Marxist socialism and want to convince ordinary people that these are “true American democracy.”

We SHALL see and hear this O’Reilly’s broadcasting today. Black Lives Matter communists’ board together with several US Corporations are working to overthrow USA Republic government system to install a communist socialist system. “Deja Vu” Remember the Business Plot (also called The White House Putsch) was political “movement” in 1933 in the United States to overthrow the government of President Roosevelt and install a dictator. A retired Major General Mr. Butler asserted that wealthy US businessmen were plotting to create a fascist organization with Butler as its leader and use it in a coup d’etat to overthrow Roosevelt. In 1934, Butler testified under oath before the USHR Special Committee ‘Un-American Activities on these revelations. No one was prosecuted.

At the time of the incidents, most major news media dismissed the plot, with a New York Times editorial characterizing it as a “gigantic hoax”. While historians have questioned whether or not a coup was actually close to execution, most agree that some sort of “wild scheme” was contemplated and discussed. See it here: https://www.messenger.com/messenger_media/?thread_id=100039579020590&attachment_id=822666595035707&message_id=mid.%24cAAAAD9b8kOJ_Bt7iIV41ZmYf87TT

From our contributor Mr. Fred Speech, he tells us that this is the real plan “Conspiracy theory refers Conspiracy reality” This article was originally written in November 2020- I stand by this. Many are already taking place. We are literally creating an Authoritarian State. Anyone who ignores this reality is part of it or desires a Democrat Dictatorship. Apparently the Biden team has admitted that Hunter Biden is being investigated. Of course we all knew this. It’s step 1 in the plan to put Kamala Harris into the top Position. The Democrats socialist left wing isn’t interested in an elder white man remaining in control. And Biden is culpable in this agenda. He can’t be oblivious to his own mental insufficiency. He is a tool fit his handlers. And after a short time as President he will be exposed and step down. As he is incapable of ethical behavior it’s second nature. The we will experience the reality of a Marxist in the White House. The New Democrats party is currently creating a 25 amendment committee to remove Biden for his Dementia. It’s a bait and switch to institute the Harris Presidential administration. This fanatical Marxist is a dictatorship in waiting. They plan is destroying the judicial branch with additional 4 new activist judges. Pure treason and adding two New Democrats controlled states will eliminate a two party balance. In addition the will change the filibuster rule allowing a simple majority to rule the country. And give voting rights to millions of illegal immigrants. The constitution will be dismissed as obsolete and the Authoritarian regimes will start. Kamala Harris is Joe Biden’s official VP pick. She is a graduate of a Marxist Maoist training camp known as the Rockwood Leadership Institute, which is funded by George Soros and Stephen Phillips. Linda Sarsour, Black Lives Matter founder Alicia Garza, Jodi Evans of Code Pink, Andrew Gillum, and Stacey Abrams are some of the other graduates of the same institute. Since Biden has dementia, I guess he’s probably already forgotten about the time Kamala attacked him on stage at the Democrat Debates, calling him a racist. What a clown show! He picked a Marxist VP. They truly want to destroy America.

“The end of ethical government “The Democrats are channeling the fascist and communist regimes . Re-education camps are actually being suggested. The school and universities are all cesspool of Marxist dogma. The history of using race as a cudgels is well documented. Brainwashing the weak minds is relatively easy the subliminal media methodology has been in play for decades. Now the Democrats socialist fascistic mentality is exposed . What the left has created is undeniably militant ideology. These are the children of the uneducated American hating frauds . They perpetuated this too allow intimidation tactics. Just like the Democrats promoted the KKK to control the southern states and to intimidate the Black population in the early 20 century . They used these communist Anarchist for cannon fodder. If you analyze history it’s apparent that thuggery has it’s uses . The fact that they are incapable of controlling these savages is obvious. “ Hoist on your own Petard” . Even the mysterious financier(Soros ) who use his billions to destroy western culture is effectively unable to control his minions. These “loose cannons” are the end result of indoctrination gone wild Democrats socialist and devaluation of a moral compass are responsible Their lack insight into the morality and values of America . They used the new age cultural values and societal values of the dogmatic effete . Attempting to indoctrination our children into Their perverse identity politics and immoral ideology. What this attitude creates is a deep hate of our country and western culture. If you despise our past you ignore the effort and greatness of America. This viewpoint is the reason educators are proselytizing to the sheep. It’s a old technique. The Marxist used it to promote hate and revolutionary activist. We are seeing the same misrepresentation used today . My experience has made me suspicious of those who use secular values to promote their agenda and as a lever to tip the scales. It’s a perpetual state of self loathing that destroys society and creates anarchies.

The N.A.F.A. National Association for Foreign Attorneys. We oppose the illegitimacy of the Democratic Party in wanting to have the only impartial judicial branch- the Supreme Court of the United States- converted into a political power.

Saludos- Aviso: Como Ustedes pueden ver aquí seguido, el mismo día Yo con mi organización Court AICAC-HR, se presentaron simultáneamente dos denuncias- una ante la OEA , otra incluyendo esta ante las Naciones Unidas Oficina, ambas a la Comisionado General Derechos Humanos- la primera en Washington DC y la segunda en Génova, Suiza.

Tema: Violación de Derechos Humanos – Caso COVID-19 CHINA.

Esta oficina UN Suiza respondió, igualmente OEA Washington DC el día 21 – 25 del corriente y muy similar la oficina de la OEA, Y cito:  

RESPUESTA DE ONU #1:

Petitions and Urgent Actions Section
Human Rights Treaties Branch

Human Rights Council and Treaty Mechanisms Division
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights...

Citamos: “Después de haber revisado cuidadosamente el contenido de su reclamo, hemos observado que no parece que se cumplan los siguientes criterios preliminares: Una denuncia en virtud de uno de los nueve tratados solo puede presentarse contra un Estado que cumpla dos condiciones. Primero, debe ser parte (mediante ratificación o adhesión) del tratado que establece los derechos que presuntamente han sido violados. En segundo lugar, el Estado parte debe haber reconocido la competencia del comité que supervisa ese tratado para recibir y considerar denuncias de particulares. Lamentablemente, ni los Estados Unidos de América ni China han reconocido la competencia de ninguno de los comités que supervisan los tratados de derechos humanos pertinentes…”

************

Ahora- Court AICAC-HR y Yo esperamos la respuesta de la refuta presentada hoy ante la OEA DD HH para así tomar una acción similar debido a que aunque EE.UU., ni China han reconocido la competencia del Comité de la ONU en DD.HH., y China no es Estado de la OEA, alegamos que esto es un caso sui juris y esta Corte AICAC-HR es una organización INGO que obliga a NU y su Comisionado General en DD.HH., a prestar atención y consideración siguiendo su propia regla, y citamos: 

“El Consejo de Derechos Humanos, a través de su Examen Periódico Universal, examina periódicamente el cumplimiento por cada uno de los 193 Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas de sus obligaciones y compromisos en materia de derechos humanos. El proceso del EPU prevé la participación de todas las partes interesadas pertinentes, incluidas las organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG), las instituciones nacionales de derechos humanos (INDH) y los mecanismos regionales. También puede enviar información a los titulares de mandatos de los procedimientos especiales del Consejo de Derechos Humanos con respecto a las denuncias de violación de los derechos humanos. La decisión de intervenir queda a discreción de los titulares de mandatos, quienes pueden optar por intervenir directamente ante los gobiernos, las instituciones intergubernamentales o los agentes no estatales…” ver detalles para presentar esta denuncia de forma sui juris: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/Pages/Communications.aspx

                                                                          ************

Sabemos de la influencia adversa del gobierno Chino, su partido comunista y su líder Xi Jinping sobre la UN-HR – WHO, pero no dejaremos estas violaciones criminales sin tomar acción hasta el final incluyendo a las cortes de opinión pública.

                                                                     &&&&&&&&&&&&

RESPUESTA DE ONU DD HH #2:

From: Petitions OHCHR petitions@ohchr.org United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 10:56 PM
To: SECRETARIA GENERAL GENERAL OFFICE <secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us>
Subject: FW: Petition Submitted for consideration under Article 22

Dear  Sir, Humphrey H. Pachecker

We hereby acknowledge receipt of your complaint.

             Please note that the individual complaint procedures under the United Nations Human Rights Treaties require that certain preliminary criteria are satisfied before the relevant Treaty Bodies (Committees) can proceed with the examination of a complaint.

             After having carefully reviewed the content of your complaint, we have noted that the following preliminary criteria do not appear to be met:

A complaint under one of the nine treaties can be brought only against a State that satisfies two conditions. First, it must be a party (through ratification or accession) to the treaty that provides for the rights, which have allegedly been violated. Second, the State party must have recognized the competence of the committee monitoring that treaty to receive and consider complaints from individuals. Unfortunately, neither the United States of America nor China has recognized the competence of any of the committees monitoring the relevant human rights treaties.

Therefore, your complaint is being returned to you, together with the supporting documents (if applicable).

            For further information about the individual complaint procedures under the United Nations Human Rights Treaties please visit our website at www.ohchr.org, or consult our Fact Sheet http://ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet7Rev.2.pdf. 

We apologize for not being able to respond to you in a more positive manner.  

Yours sincerely,

&&&&&&&&&&&&

RESPUESTA #3 DE OEA DD HH:

From: CIDH Denuncias <CIDHDenuncias@oas.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 3:42 AM
To: HUMPHREY H. PACHECKER <secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us>
Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION/Inf.Pet/Kb

 Good morning,

 Thank you for your e-mail. We have received your communication, however, your request or complaint is against the state of China. In this sense, China is not part of the Organization of American States (OAS). As a result, we are unable to process your complaint. We can only process complaints against OAS member states. For more information, see the following links:

http://www.oas.org/en/member_states/default.asp

http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/mandate/petitions.asp

We apologize for the inconvenience and hope that you find this information useful.

Section for User Support and Information Management

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Organization of American States

1889 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006

1. 1 202-370-9000
   F. 202-458-3650

cidhdenuncias@oas.org

www.cidh.org

 &&&&&&&&&&&&

REFUTA PRESENTADA ANTE LA OEA DD. HH.

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 

Organization of American States 

1889 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 

Respetable Comité Derechos Humanos. Gracias por su respuesta.  

Presentamos este refuta en idioma español para el beneficio de nuestros colegas defensores de derechos humanos localizados en otros países y/o quienes no leen el idioma ingles. 

Sabemos, como Usted señala en su comunicado a nuestra oficina, que China no es parte de la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA). Como resultado, Usted alega, [OEA] no podemos procesar su queja. 

Pero en este caso, es una situación Sui juris que abarca todo el continente americano- el caribe y sus ciudadanos. En 2019, la población total de América Latina y el Caribe era de aproximadamente 646,43 millones de habitantes., esto es en todos los Estados miembros de la OEA. Ahora millones han fallecidos por esta violación de los derechos humanos tal como detallamos en nuestra denuncia presentada anteriormente. 

Igualmente, ya lo ha señalado la Corte IDH que los tratados sobre derechos humanos no son tratados ordinarios, pues las obligaciones asumidas por los Estados no son respecto de otros Estados sino respecto de los individuos bajo su jurisdicción, a las victimas de violaciones de derechos humanos (Opinión Consultiva, 1982), esto no es impedimento para que se puedan dar por terminadas a ciertas obligaciones asumidas en virtud de un ellos (Sánchez Gómez, 2015). 

Como lo establece el artículo 70 de la Convención de Viena, las consecuencias de la terminación de un tratado son [Organización de Naciones Unidas 1969]:  

1. a) eximir a las partes de la obligación de seguir cumpliendo el tratado; [primera obligación es con los individuos bajo su jurisdicción], 

1. b) no afectar a ningún derecho, obligación o situación jurídica de las partes creados por la ejecución del tratado antes de su terminación.  

Para desvincularse de las obligaciones contraídas en virtud de los tratados, el Estado parte debe hacer la respectiva denuncia del tratado o seguir las disposiciones que se establecen en el artículo 56 de la Convención de Viena. 

En nuestro escenario en el que se hace efectiva la denuncia ciudadana ante la Convención Americana es claro que se desligaría a los Estados miembros de la OEA de sus obligaciones en cuanto a ella.  

Sin embargo, dicha denuncia no significa que los demás instrumentos de protección de derechos humanos, tales como las convenciones interamericanas sobre derechos humanos en las que sea parte y la Declaración Americana, automáticamente dejen de ser vinculantes, ya que continuarían siendo miembros de la OEA (López Hualde).  

En efecto, cada uno de las convenciones interamericanas cuentan con su propio mecanismo de ratificación o adhesión, así como el respectivo procedimiento de denuncia. 

Por lo tanto, las obligaciones previstas en las Convenciones Interamericanas y el catalogo de derechos humanos de la Declaración Americana siguen vigentes para los Estados y, nosotros alegamos que en este caso sui juris, debemos considerar la responsabilidad de Estados que no son parte. 

 Respetuosamente sometido. 

 HUMPHREY H. PACHECKER. – ID #: HRUS007N. Attorney-Defender. Commissioner General of Human Rights. USA- Admitted to the AICAC-HR COURT 2016. Email: secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us

 &&&&&&&&&&&&

CORREOS RADICANDO LA DENUNCIA ORIGINAL [2] PRESENTADA ante: OEA y ante ONU – COMISION EN DD. HH.

 From: SECRETARIA GENERAL GENERAL OFFICE <secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us>
Sent: 21 March 2021 00:36
To: Petitions OHCHR <petitions@ohchr.org>
Cc: Nafa Unpam <nafalegal@ymail.com>
Subject: [External] Petition Submitted for consideration under Article 22

Communication to: Petitions Team

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

United Nations Office at Geneva

CH-1211 Geneva 10

Switzerland

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 

1889 F Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

U.S.A. 

Respectable General Secretariat. 

Presented Via Email: cidhdenuncias@oas.org 

Filed via E-mail: tb-petitions@ohchr.org

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Submitted for consideration under Article 22 of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading

Violations of Human Rights Treatment or Punishment.

1. Information concerning the author of the communication

Name: Pachecker . First name(s): Humphrey Humberto

Nationality: United State citizen Profession: Attorney – professor of law.

Present address: NAFA GROUP, CO. 3200 U S Hwy. 27 South, Suite 302, Sebring, Florida 33870

Submitting the communication as:

(a) Victim of the violations of human rights or violations set forth below.

Honorable members of this Commission. Attached hereto please find a complaint petition which consists of 108 pages, in which our names are included as representatives of Human Rights defenders of this Organization [INGO] AICAC-HR COURT. These 108 pages are 48 pages more than what is allowed by the rule of admission for complaints petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the OAS.

It is for this reason that we request four exceptions to the requirement of exhaustion, also to the admission rule, so this Commission may examine this complaint petition in which domestic remedies have not been exhausted, these are:

1. National laws do not provide due process to protect the rights allegedly violated;
2. the alleged victims are from four [4] different countries and do not have access to domestic remedies or have been prevented from exhausting them;
3. There is a delay in issuing a final decision on the case without a valid reason since they are petitioners representing citizens of four [4] different countries;
4. these alleged victims, petitioners are exempt from having to exhaust domestic remedies, because most of these people live in extreme poverty so critical that they are unable to pay in cases in which legal assistance is necessary, and the State cannot offers this service for free.

In this case it is a representative action, the parties are groups of people in four [4] different countries that are collectively represented by us, and members of one of each group registered defenders of this Organization [INGO] AICAC-HR COURT.

Therefore, for this honorable Commission to examine this petition, it is NO longer necessary to have exhausted domestic judicial remedies in accordance with the legislation in force in the countries in question.

Respectfully presented,

Humphrey Humberto Pahecker- ID #: HRUS007N. Attorney-Defender. Commissioner General of Human Rights. USA- Admitted to the AICAC-HR COURT 2016. Email: secretariat@courtaicac-hr.us

PARA VER LAS DENUNCIAS ORIGINALES PRESENTADAS- DEBES ENTRAR Y BAJAR LOS DOCUMENTOS:

1: HH. RR. COMPLAINT-1 OAS

2:H. R. COMPLAINT- U.N. GENEVA (1)

(1)- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Organization of American States

O.A.S. OFFICE AT WASHINGTON D.C. U.S.A.

&&&&&&&&&&&&

(2)- Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

UNITED NATION OFFICE AT GENEVA- SWITZERLAND

************

We are asking Communist China and its leader Xin Jinping – responsibility and compensation for the deadly Covid-19 pandemic.

What began in November 2019 as a small outbreak of an unknown virus in the Chinese industrial town of Wuhan is a pandemic that has claimed the lives of more than 2.69 million people with 122 million people sick worldwide.

A disease that will cause the world economy to shrink by more than 6% and that has eliminated one in two jobs worldwide.

The triumph of China with its macabre COVID 19 plan to defeat the US economy, as well as the world economy.

With all the countries going into debt to be able to finance the attempts to contain the contagion of Covid-19, trillions of dollars in debt to pay for vaccines; millions of people without jobs, millions of companies without income, millions in bankruptcy and entire sectors such as tourism paralyzed overnight, it is time to hear ourselves calling for responsibilities and compensation. And we accuse communist China that they have to answer for the millions of people who have died in the world and trillions of dollars in destruction; practically everyone is stopped at zero.

At the very least – China allowed this deadly virus to leave Wuhan and failed to inform the world about the virus in detail so that we can protect ourselves. They are responsible for that or worse – they are responsible for a macabre plan to win and control the world economy and rule global power.

The lawyer and law professor Dr. Humphrey Humberto Pachecker, writer of this complaint- is convinced that the COVID 19 virus was created in a Chinese laboratory, alleging that the Chinese provinces surrounding Wuhan were not contaminated as the rest of the world was contaminated- China allowed world tourism from Wuhan when they already knew it would be a pandemic.

The United States, with everything it has in its biological arsenal to take care of itself, was not able to contain this avalanche which has killed 542 thousand people until today [3/20/2021] and has contaminated 29.8 million people in the United States . It is time to do justice. See details enter here in these two [2] link: (1)- HH. RR. COMPLAINT-1 OAS (2)- H. R. COMPLAINT- U.N. GENEVA

                &&&&&&&&&&&&

Les estamos pidiendo a China comunista y su líder Xin Jinping- responsabilidad y compensación por la mortal pandemia de Covid-19.

Lo que comenzó en noviembre del año 2019 como un pequeño brote de un virus desconocido en el pueblo industrial chino de Wuhan es una pandemia que se ha cobrado la vida de más 2.69 millones de personas con 122 millones de personas enfermas mundialmente.

Una enfermedad que hará que la economía mundial retroceda más de un 6% y que ha eliminado a uno de cada dos empleos en todo el planeta.

El triunfo de China con su macabro plan COVID 19 para derrotar la economía de EE.UU., igualmente la economía mundial.

Con todos los países endeudándose para poder financiar los intentos de contener el contagio de Covid-19, billones de dólares en deudas para costear las vacunas; millones de personas sin empleo, millones de empresas sin ingresos, millones en quiebra y sectores enteros como el turismo paralizados de la noche a la mañana, ya es hora de oírnos pidiendo responsabilidades y compensación. Y acusamos a China comunista tienen que responder por los millones de personas que han muerto en el mundo y trillones de dólares en destrucción; prácticamente todo el mundo se encuentra detenido en cero.

Como mínimo- China permitió que este virus mortal saliera de Wuhan y falló a la hora de informar al mundo sobre el virus en detalle para que podamos protegernos. Son responsables de eso o peor aún- son responsables de un plan macabro para ganar y controlar la economía mundial y gobernar el poder global.

El abogado y profesor de derecho Dr. Humphrey Humberto Pachecker, escritor de este denuncia- está convencido de que el virus COVID 19 fue creado en un laboratorio chino alegando que las provincias chinas aledañas a Wuhan no se contaminaron como se contaminó el resto del mundo- China permitió el turismo mundial desde Wuhan cuando ya sabían que sería un pandemia.

Estados Unidos, con todo lo que tiene en su arsenal biológico para cuidarse, no fue capaz de contener esta avalancha la cual ha matado hasta hoy [3/20/2021] a 542 mil personas y ha contaminado a 29.8 millones de personas en Estados Unidos. Es hora de hacer justicia. Ver detalles entrando por estos dos [2] enlaces: (1)- HH. RR. COMPLAINT-1 OAS (2)- H. R. COMPLAINT- U.N. GENEVA